Ranking Çanakkale Districts in terms of Rangeland Quality with Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods
نویسندگان
چکیده
Based on the Project report of Determination Rangeland Availability and Range Status Classes carried out by Management Eastern Anatolia Agricultural Research Institute, eleven districts Çanakkale are ordered in terms rangeland quality. For this reason, four different rankings were obtained AHP, TOPSIS, VIKOR WASPAS methods. According to made methods, while district with highest quality was Biga, according TOPSIS method found be Central district.
منابع مشابه
Prioritizing Rangeland Improvement Practices using Multi-Criteria Decision Making Approach
Selecting the appropriate rangeland improvement method is a challenging task for range managers because it requires consideration of various criteria. This study was aimed to evaluate various restoration and reclamation practices in the rangelands of Semirom-Isfahan using Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods. Grazing management, water point development, pit seeding, exclosure, water ...
متن کاملFuzzy Multi-criteria decision making approach for human capital evaluation of municipal districts
People in every organization could be considered as the most important resource which contributes to the development of that organization. In fact, human capital is the most important dimension of organization’s intellectual capital especially in service-oriented organizations like municipality. Therefore, the main purpose of this paper is to introduce a suitable framework for human capital eva...
متن کاملranking of insurance companies using multi attribute decision making methods
insurance companies are important economic institutions in each country and support other economic institutions and good performance of them has an effective role in economic boom. insurance companies to achieve strong and effective performance must be aware of the environment, the competitor and their performance and carry out necessary actions with regard to this information. in this study, t...
متن کاملRisk management in urban tunnels using methods of game theory and multi-criteria decision-making
In general, underground spaces are associated with high risks because of their high uncertainty in geotechnical environments. Since most accidents and incidents in these structures are often associated with uncertainty, the development of risk analysis and management methods and prevention of accidents are essential. A deeper recognition of the factors affecting the implementation process can p...
متن کاملThe place of AHP method among Multi Criteria Decision Making methods in forest management
As the name implies, Multi Criteria Decision Making Methods (MCDMs) is a decision making tool that capable the selection of the most preferred choice in a context where several criteria apply simultaneously. Primary purpose of this study is to examine the status of Multi Criteria Decision Making Methods (MCDMs) in forest management. The study also aims to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Turkish Journal of Agricultural and Natural Science
سال: 2023
ISSN: ['2148-3647']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.30910/turkjans.1183698